Ancient : Punch Marked Coin, Magadha Janapada (600-350 BC), Silver Vimshatika, Archaic period, Series 0

-

 Ancient : Punch Marked Coin, Magadha Janapada (600-350 BC), Silver Vimshatika, Archaic period, Series 0,

Obv: three punch marks consisting of a large six-armed symbol in the center flanked by a bull and a geometric symbol by its sides, Rev: uniface, 5.25 Grams (Unlisted type), about extremely fine with toning, Extremely Rare.
Note: An interesting type with only 3 symbols instead of usual 5 symbols

https://indiannumismaticgallery.com/




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Independent Kingdom: Sikh Empire, Ranjit Singh, Sri Amritsar Mint, Silver Rupee, VS 1879‘Nanakshahi’ Couplet,

-
Image
  Independent Kingdom: Sikh Empire, Ranjit Singh, Sri Amritsar Mint, Silver Rupee, VS 1879‘Nanakshahi’ Couplet, Without any distinctive symbol, Obv: sikka zad bar har do alam fazal sachaha sahib ast, fateh gobind shah-e-shahan teghi nanak wahab ast, Rev: bakht akal takht & zarb Sri Amritsar jiyo, (Gurprit # 1.57.01) https://indiannumismaticgallery.com/
Read more

Mughal ; Shah Alam Bahadur, Silver Rupee, Khambayat Mint, AH 1119 / RY Ahd, Zafar word at top divider on rev. Very Rare.

-
Image
  Mughal ; Shah Alam Bahadur, Silver Rupee, Khambayat Mint, AH 1119 / RY Ahd, Zafar word at top divider on rev. Very Rare. Note : The REV has the word  Zafar ظفر (victorious)  vs the standard 'maimanat' indicating victory of Shah Alam over his brother Azam Shah. Aurangzeb died 3 March 1707; AH1119 starts April 4 1707; Azam Shah killed at Jajau (between Gwalior & Agra) on 20 June 1707. The so called "Willed Plan" of leaving North India to Moazzam, Central India to Azam and South India (especially centered at Hyderabad & Bijapur) to Kam Bakhsh did not work out. The story that such a will was under the pillow of Alamgir MAY BE TRUE , because he issued orders just before his death, for Azam to move and take over Malwa, and Kam Bakhsh to take over Bijapur, but left Moazzam Bahadur stay put. These two princes had "Physically moved on these orders". Hence Khambayet issue is correct, issued after June 1707, but still in AH 1119. https://indiannumismaticgalle
Read more