IPS ; Gwalior, Shahjahanpur Mint, Silver Rupee, 15 RY, In the name of Shah Alam II,

-

 IPS ; Gwalior, Shahjahanpur Mint, Silver Rupee, 15 RY,

In the name of Shah Alam II,
Obv: Sikka Mubarak Badshah Ghazi Shah Alam,
Rev: Sana 15 julus, Trishul mint mark & Zarb Shahjahanpur at the bottom, Weight : 11.10 Grams
(Unlisted in major catalogs) Extremely Fine, Extremely Rare.
Note : This coin was struck in 1775 AD when it was under the control of Rohillas Sardar Dundey Khan Shahjahanpuri. After the battle of Miranpur Katra, the territory was annexed by Shuja’a ud-Daula, the Nawab of Awadh. The coin could have been issued by anyone of these two contenders. But this specimen bears a Trisul as a mint-mark, it is more likely to have been an issue of Awadh. There is also a possibility of Shahjahanpur is presently known as “Shajapur” and is located in central Madhya Pradesh. Shajapur named after the honor of Shahjahan the Mughal Emperor who halted here in 1640. It is said that the original name was Shahjahanpur, which subsequently reduces to Shajapur. This town was under the control of Gwalior and it is likely that a mint was operated here is 1775 under the aegis of Gwalior.
https://indiannumismaticgallery.com/



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mughal ; Shah Alam Bahadur, Silver Rupee, Khambayat Mint, AH 1119 / RY Ahd, Zafar word at top divider on rev. Very Rare.

-
Image
  Mughal ; Shah Alam Bahadur, Silver Rupee, Khambayat Mint, AH 1119 / RY Ahd, Zafar word at top divider on rev. Very Rare. Note : The REV has the word  Zafar ظفر (victorious)  vs the standard 'maimanat' indicating victory of Shah Alam over his brother Azam Shah. Aurangzeb died 3 March 1707; AH1119 starts April 4 1707; Azam Shah killed at Jajau (between Gwalior & Agra) on 20 June 1707. The so called "Willed Plan" of leaving North India to Moazzam, Central India to Azam and South India (especially centered at Hyderabad & Bijapur) to Kam Bakhsh did not work out. The story that such a will was under the pillow of Alamgir MAY BE TRUE , because he issued orders just before his death, for Azam to move and take over Malwa, and Kam Bakhsh to take over Bijapur, but left Moazzam Bahadur stay put. These two princes had "Physically moved on these orders". Hence Khambayet issue is correct, issued after June 1707, but still in AH 1119. https://indiannumismaticgalle
Read more

Delhi Sultan ; Khiljis, Silver Square Tanka Qutb al-Din Mubarak Shah (1316-1320 AD), Mint : Hadrat Dar al-Khilafa ; AH 719,

-
Image
  Delhi Sultan ; Khiljis, Silver Square Tanka Qutb al-Din Mubarak Shah (1316-1320 AD), Mint : Hadrat Dar al-Khilafa ; AH 719, G&G D261, Weight : 11.02 Grams Obv: Arabic legend Al-imam al a'zam khilafat rabb al-alamim qutab al-dunya wa al din abu Muzzafar Mubarak Shah. Rev: Arabic legend al-sultan ibn al sultan al-wathiq billah amir al-mu'minin, mint name and AH date in margins. Extremely fine, Very rare. https://indiannumismaticgallery.com/
Read more